![]() A diferencia de Nimzowitch, que en "Mi Sistema", el autor pone ejemplos donde se aplican elementos como "el bloqueador", "el peón pasado", "ataque evolucionado vs ataque revolucionado", los ejemplos del ajedrez "dinámico" que muestra Moskalenko en muchas de sus propias partidas, no parece poder aplicar su revolucionario sistema a las mismas. Mi opinión es que no hay nada nuevo bajo el sol. Moskalenko en su quinto touchstone indica que esto no se ha tratado en libros como Mi Sistema de Nimzowitch y por ende, esto es probablemente lo que lo hace revolucionario, de acuerdo al autor. En principio -si quitamos el 5 postulado- los otros cuatro forman de alguna manera lo que ya Steinitz nos enseñó sobre cómo valorar una posición. Sin embargo, el sistema que define, que se basa en cinco "touchstones", no resulta convincente: 1) material, 2) desarrollo, 3) posición de las piezas y los peones, 4) posición del rey y 5) tiempo. Revolucione su Ajedrez es sin duda un interesante esfuerzo del GM Moskalenko. Looks to me, in some way, just a clever book title more than real a way to play better chess. ![]() I cant find a real new system to a better chess. ![]() So, Moskalenko went so far in his system and even he has a very interesting approach, I can't find a general method to be applied to a chess game to finally accomplish the goal of playing a better chess.īriefly: To me, Moskalenko rewrote Pachman, Nimzowitch and others about what is chess strategy. what is better? Time advantage or king security? How to contrast one to each other to find who is better? A real mystery. He then says then -T2 +T3, he means: white has a insecure king (not too much) and a little advantage in time But. In some position, Moskalenko evaluate it using his 5 touchstones to find out who has the advantage. Many of Moskalenko examples are difficult positions to evaluate and the ultimate result often comes from time trouble at the end of the game. the system cannot be applied to the games he presents. ![]() In Moskalenko's book, his dynamic chess examples, often from his own games, look difficult to apply the author's ideas. In Nimzowitch's system, the author give us examples where his system is applied, like the blocking piece, the passed pawn,revolutionary attack and evolutionary attack, etc. In my opinion, there is nothing new under the sun. Moskalenko says that the time factor is not even mentioned in important books like Nimzowitch's My System and probably this is why Moskalenko system is revolutionary. Take out the last touchstone and we have what Steinitz show to us about how to evaluate a position. ![]() However, his system is based in five touchstones, and I think they are not very convincing: 1. Revolutionize your Chess is undoubtely an interesting effort of GM Moskalenko. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
February 2023
Categories |